Topics / Geopolitics
Should the UK increase defence spending substantially, even if it means cuts elsewhere?
Should the UK raise defence spending substantially, and if so, how should it be paid for: by cutting other spending, by borrowing or taxation, or not at all? The disagreement turns on how serious the threat environment is, what security requires, and how to weigh defence against public services, overseas aid and the public finances.
Positions
- Yes: The threat environment has changed fundamentally since 2022, and security is the first duty of government. The UK should increase defence spending substantially and sustainably, even if that means difficult cuts or reprioritisation elsewhere.
- Increase moderately, funded by borrowing or tax: The UK should increase defence spending, but at a measured pace and funded by borrowing or fairer taxation, rather than by cutting public services or overseas aid.
- No: The UK should not substantially increase defence spending at the expense of other priorities. Security is better served by diplomacy, strong alliances, more efficient use of the existing defence budget, and investment in domestic resilience and public services.